Loading...
1#include <linux/atomic.h>
2#include <linux/rwsem.h>
3#include <linux/percpu.h>
4#include <linux/wait.h>
5#include <linux/lockdep.h>
6#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
7#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
8#include <linux/sched.h>
9#include <linux/errno.h>
10
11int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem,
12 const char *name, struct lock_class_key *rwsem_key)
13{
14 sem->read_count = alloc_percpu(int);
15 if (unlikely(!sem->read_count))
16 return -ENOMEM;
17
18 /* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */
19 rcu_sync_init(&sem->rss, RCU_SCHED_SYNC);
20 __init_rwsem(&sem->rw_sem, name, rwsem_key);
21 init_waitqueue_head(&sem->writer);
22 sem->readers_block = 0;
23 return 0;
24}
25EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_init_rwsem);
26
27void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
28{
29 /*
30 * XXX: temporary kludge. The error path in alloc_super()
31 * assumes that percpu_free_rwsem() is safe after kzalloc().
32 */
33 if (!sem->read_count)
34 return;
35
36 rcu_sync_dtor(&sem->rss);
37 free_percpu(sem->read_count);
38 sem->read_count = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */
39}
40EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_free_rwsem);
41
42int __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, int try)
43{
44 /*
45 * Due to having preemption disabled the decrement happens on
46 * the same CPU as the increment, avoiding the
47 * increment-on-one-CPU-and-decrement-on-another problem.
48 *
49 * If the reader misses the writer's assignment of readers_block, then
50 * the writer is guaranteed to see the reader's increment.
51 *
52 * Conversely, any readers that increment their sem->read_count after
53 * the writer looks are guaranteed to see the readers_block value,
54 * which in turn means that they are guaranteed to immediately
55 * decrement their sem->read_count, so that it doesn't matter that the
56 * writer missed them.
57 */
58
59 smp_mb(); /* A matches D */
60
61 /*
62 * If !readers_block the critical section starts here, matched by the
63 * release in percpu_up_write().
64 */
65 if (likely(!smp_load_acquire(&sem->readers_block)))
66 return 1;
67
68 /*
69 * Per the above comment; we still have preemption disabled and
70 * will thus decrement on the same CPU as we incremented.
71 */
72 __percpu_up_read(sem);
73
74 if (try)
75 return 0;
76
77 /*
78 * We either call schedule() in the wait, or we'll fall through
79 * and reschedule on the preempt_enable() in percpu_down_read().
80 */
81 preempt_enable_no_resched();
82
83 /*
84 * Avoid lockdep for the down/up_read() we already have them.
85 */
86 __down_read(&sem->rw_sem);
87 this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
88 __up_read(&sem->rw_sem);
89
90 preempt_disable();
91 return 1;
92}
93EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_down_read);
94
95void __percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
96{
97 smp_mb(); /* B matches C */
98 /*
99 * In other words, if they see our decrement (presumably to aggregate
100 * zero, as that is the only time it matters) they will also see our
101 * critical section.
102 */
103 __this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
104
105 /* Prod writer to recheck readers_active */
106 wake_up(&sem->writer);
107}
108EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_up_read);
109
110#define per_cpu_sum(var) \
111({ \
112 typeof(var) __sum = 0; \
113 int cpu; \
114 compiletime_assert_atomic_type(__sum); \
115 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) \
116 __sum += per_cpu(var, cpu); \
117 __sum; \
118})
119
120/*
121 * Return true if the modular sum of the sem->read_count per-CPU variable is
122 * zero. If this sum is zero, then it is stable due to the fact that if any
123 * newly arriving readers increment a given counter, they will immediately
124 * decrement that same counter.
125 */
126static bool readers_active_check(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
127{
128 if (per_cpu_sum(*sem->read_count) != 0)
129 return false;
130
131 /*
132 * If we observed the decrement; ensure we see the entire critical
133 * section.
134 */
135
136 smp_mb(); /* C matches B */
137
138 return true;
139}
140
141void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
142{
143 /* Notify readers to take the slow path. */
144 rcu_sync_enter(&sem->rss);
145
146 down_write(&sem->rw_sem);
147
148 /*
149 * Notify new readers to block; up until now, and thus throughout the
150 * longish rcu_sync_enter() above, new readers could still come in.
151 */
152 WRITE_ONCE(sem->readers_block, 1);
153
154 smp_mb(); /* D matches A */
155
156 /*
157 * If they don't see our writer of readers_block, then we are
158 * guaranteed to see their sem->read_count increment, and therefore
159 * will wait for them.
160 */
161
162 /* Wait for all now active readers to complete. */
163 wait_event(sem->writer, readers_active_check(sem));
164}
165EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_down_write);
166
167void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
168{
169 /*
170 * Signal the writer is done, no fast path yet.
171 *
172 * One reason that we cannot just immediately flip to readers_fast is
173 * that new readers might fail to see the results of this writer's
174 * critical section.
175 *
176 * Therefore we force it through the slow path which guarantees an
177 * acquire and thereby guarantees the critical section's consistency.
178 */
179 smp_store_release(&sem->readers_block, 0);
180
181 /*
182 * Release the write lock, this will allow readers back in the game.
183 */
184 up_write(&sem->rw_sem);
185
186 /*
187 * Once this completes (at least one RCU-sched grace period hence) the
188 * reader fast path will be available again. Safe to use outside the
189 * exclusive write lock because its counting.
190 */
191 rcu_sync_exit(&sem->rss);
192}
193EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_up_write);
1#include <linux/atomic.h>
2#include <linux/rwsem.h>
3#include <linux/percpu.h>
4#include <linux/wait.h>
5#include <linux/lockdep.h>
6#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
7#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
8#include <linux/sched.h>
9#include <linux/errno.h>
10
11int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw,
12 const char *name, struct lock_class_key *rwsem_key)
13{
14 brw->fast_read_ctr = alloc_percpu(int);
15 if (unlikely(!brw->fast_read_ctr))
16 return -ENOMEM;
17
18 /* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */
19 __init_rwsem(&brw->rw_sem, name, rwsem_key);
20 atomic_set(&brw->write_ctr, 0);
21 atomic_set(&brw->slow_read_ctr, 0);
22 init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq);
23 return 0;
24}
25
26void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
27{
28 free_percpu(brw->fast_read_ctr);
29 brw->fast_read_ctr = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */
30}
31
32/*
33 * This is the fast-path for down_read/up_read, it only needs to ensure
34 * there is no pending writer (atomic_read(write_ctr) == 0) and inc/dec the
35 * fast per-cpu counter. The writer uses synchronize_sched_expedited() to
36 * serialize with the preempt-disabled section below.
37 *
38 * The nontrivial part is that we should guarantee acquire/release semantics
39 * in case when
40 *
41 * R_W: down_write() comes after up_read(), the writer should see all
42 * changes done by the reader
43 * or
44 * W_R: down_read() comes after up_write(), the reader should see all
45 * changes done by the writer
46 *
47 * If this helper fails the callers rely on the normal rw_semaphore and
48 * atomic_dec_and_test(), so in this case we have the necessary barriers.
49 *
50 * But if it succeeds we do not have any barriers, atomic_read(write_ctr) or
51 * __this_cpu_add() below can be reordered with any LOAD/STORE done by the
52 * reader inside the critical section. See the comments in down_write and
53 * up_write below.
54 */
55static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, unsigned int val)
56{
57 bool success = false;
58
59 preempt_disable();
60 if (likely(!atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr))) {
61 __this_cpu_add(*brw->fast_read_ctr, val);
62 success = true;
63 }
64 preempt_enable();
65
66 return success;
67}
68
69/*
70 * Like the normal down_read() this is not recursive, the writer can
71 * come after the first percpu_down_read() and create the deadlock.
72 *
73 * Note: returns with lock_is_held(brw->rw_sem) == T for lockdep,
74 * percpu_up_read() does rwsem_release(). This pairs with the usage
75 * of ->rw_sem in percpu_down/up_write().
76 */
77void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
78{
79 might_sleep();
80 if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1))) {
81 rwsem_acquire_read(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
82 return;
83 }
84
85 down_read(&brw->rw_sem);
86 atomic_inc(&brw->slow_read_ctr);
87 /* avoid up_read()->rwsem_release() */
88 __up_read(&brw->rw_sem);
89}
90
91void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
92{
93 rwsem_release(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
94
95 if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, -1)))
96 return;
97
98 /* false-positive is possible but harmless */
99 if (atomic_dec_and_test(&brw->slow_read_ctr))
100 wake_up_all(&brw->write_waitq);
101}
102
103static int clear_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
104{
105 unsigned int sum = 0;
106 int cpu;
107
108 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
109 sum += per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu);
110 per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu) = 0;
111 }
112
113 return sum;
114}
115
116/*
117 * A writer increments ->write_ctr to force the readers to switch to the
118 * slow mode, note the atomic_read() check in update_fast_ctr().
119 *
120 * After that the readers can only inc/dec the slow ->slow_read_ctr counter,
121 * ->fast_read_ctr is stable. Once the writer moves its sum into the slow
122 * counter it represents the number of active readers.
123 *
124 * Finally the writer takes ->rw_sem for writing and blocks the new readers,
125 * then waits until the slow counter becomes zero.
126 */
127void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
128{
129 /* tell update_fast_ctr() there is a pending writer */
130 atomic_inc(&brw->write_ctr);
131 /*
132 * 1. Ensures that write_ctr != 0 is visible to any down_read/up_read
133 * so that update_fast_ctr() can't succeed.
134 *
135 * 2. Ensures we see the result of every previous this_cpu_add() in
136 * update_fast_ctr().
137 *
138 * 3. Ensures that if any reader has exited its critical section via
139 * fast-path, it executes a full memory barrier before we return.
140 * See R_W case in the comment above update_fast_ctr().
141 */
142 synchronize_sched_expedited();
143
144 /* exclude other writers, and block the new readers completely */
145 down_write(&brw->rw_sem);
146
147 /* nobody can use fast_read_ctr, move its sum into slow_read_ctr */
148 atomic_add(clear_fast_ctr(brw), &brw->slow_read_ctr);
149
150 /* wait for all readers to complete their percpu_up_read() */
151 wait_event(brw->write_waitq, !atomic_read(&brw->slow_read_ctr));
152}
153
154void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
155{
156 /* release the lock, but the readers can't use the fast-path */
157 up_write(&brw->rw_sem);
158 /*
159 * Insert the barrier before the next fast-path in down_read,
160 * see W_R case in the comment above update_fast_ctr().
161 */
162 synchronize_sched_expedited();
163 /* the last writer unblocks update_fast_ctr() */
164 atomic_dec(&brw->write_ctr);
165}